Skip to content

minimax m3 vs kimi k2.6: when a 1-point gap is the whole story

Illustration of a man in a tuxedo sniffing two glasses labeled M3 and K2.6 while suited figures watch in a neon-lit room models

minimax m3 outperformed kimi k2.6 on artificial analysis intelligence index – but is it really better?

55 vs 54. a 1-point lead on the index. with a 1.5-month gap between them

kimi wins osworld verified (73.1 vs 70) and leads on speed – 95 tok/s median vs 58.8. minimax takes swe bench pro (59 vs 58.6) and browsecomp (83.5 vs 83.2) by razor margins. plus a 1m context window vs kimi's 262k

kimi k2.6 dropped april 20. minimax answered with m3 on june 1 – and caught up on multimodal input

what this really tells you: these models have commodified. the gap is noise, not signal

we'll wait for moonshot to answer

Benchmark comparison table of Kimi K2.6 and MiniMax M3 showing scores for OSWorld, SWE Bench Pro, BrowseComp, speed, and context window
Portrait of Addy Crezee, author at thehype.news

Addy Crezee

Founder, CEO & Editor-in-Chief at thehype. Addy is a serial entrepreneur building products and communities since 2014. In 2024, he founded /function1, one of the largest AI conferences in the world, scaling from 0 to 10k attendees in its first year.

More articles by Addy Crezee →
ON AIR · RADIO.THEHYPE.NEWS ↗ ai news radio — 24/7